Latest post Sat, Mar 5 2022 9:47 AM by Vilem. 16 replies.
Page 2 of 2 (17 items) < Previous 1 2
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • Fri, Mar 4 2022 3:15 AM In reply to

    Re: DNxHD codecs are gone?

    And why change it. The old names were so obvious 36 is worse than 85 etc...

    40 MC 2021.12 x Mostly PC Terrablock ISIS 1000 [view my complete system specs]
  • Sat, Mar 5 2022 9:47 AM In reply to

    • Vilem
    • Top 75 Contributor
    • Joined on Sat, Apr 10 2010
    • Prague
    • Posts 1,444
    • Points 15,855

    Re: DNxHD codecs are gone?

    nigelgourley:

    And why change it. The old names were so obvious 36 is worse than 85 etc...

    Hello, for me, the new labeling is a logical outcome of the situation and codecs and formats. Size numbering is currently inaccurate and outdated. The new DNxHD tag unifies the tag with DNxHR and Prores codecs. The old markings were very complex, for each framerate and resolution had a different value. (for example 180DNxHD 50i, the quality of 360DNxHD 50p is similar, etc ...) The current marking LB, SQ and HQX is clearer for me, no matter the project settings, it informs about the quality of the codec.
    V.

     

    AVID MC2021.12, HP Z620 - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620, Quadro P2000 - driver 461.72, RAM 48GB - DDR3, BM Intensity Pro 4k - 12.1, W10 - 64bit Professional... [view my complete system specs]
Page 2 of 2 (17 items) < Previous 1 2

© Copyright 2011 Avid Technology, Inc.  Terms of Use |  Privacy Policy |  Site Map |  Find a Reseller