Absolutely, that's why it bothers me that I have to pay extra for symphony option. Symphony should no longer exist at all, all those features should be included in the base MC price. If I'm paying extra for it I expect it to be improved over time. I'm certainly glad for the work Avid has provided me over the years but I'd also love an

Agreed. What was great 15 years ago no longer represents an acceptable solution. I do lots of temp stuff and I want it to look good. I also don't have the time to round trip through ten different programs to get a good result. So I'm stuck really. I feel like Avid is under in insurmountable backlog of updates and simply don't have the people

When I clone something, I may have the right texture but the wrong lighting or hue etc. I want very badly to be able to do basic HSL adjustments to the content of the clone. For example I clone a bush and want to cover a camera person standing in front of another part of the bush. The leaves are the same but the sun is falling differently on the only

This is probably pretty niche but it's something I've noticed that bothers me. Make a change to the magic mask in paint tool then try and ctrl+z to get back to default. Nope. I now have to ctrl+z about 15 times because even if I've moved the slider without letting go, for some reason Avid still seems to log a bunch of steps and requires

But I mean? It's TWO YEARS?? Two whole years have passed and we are still seeing constant complaints? How is this even slightly acceptable? Y'all need to hire some people who can fix this faster if you're not able to fix it yourselves. This is the absolute worst PR for your company, you are getting trashed continuously by your users. Every

You can show the source colours in the timeline and that gives you the option to colour different clips different colours IIRC. Then you can see at a glance what is a different frame rate? Andi

Buy it from Boris not Avid. Might as well go to the source. I have it and love it, use it a lot for stabilising things Avid can't, use it a LOT for it's integration with the Witness protection Continuum plugin effect - it's tracking is soooo much smoother than Avids and the results are far, far better. I also think, if you can put the time

Thank you Marianna! Andi

Just want to reiterate almost one year later, how useful it would be to be able to NAME THE CORRECTIONS WE MAKE! And have MORE OF THEM! This cannot be something that is too hard to do and it would vastly improve the usefulness of the CC module. Does anyone at Avid have any info on upcoming improvements to the colour corrector? I have to work with this

Is there no way you can send them just the sections and ask them to run them? (make sure you give handles either side as vidcheck is also temporal and will take in to account how long a clip is too). You could also contact Telestream for a trial of vidcheck? http://www.telestream.net/telestream-support/vidchecker/download.htm Good luck mate, I know