-
Ok, thanks for clearing that up folks. Now Rip Van Avid will go back to my looooooong nap. Cheers, Jef
-
Thank you Iny, I have communicated with them and provided a screen recording of the issue. For others out there, my testing seems to say that this bug is isolated to MC2023.12.1. MC 2023.8.2 does NOT have the problem and works as expected. Jef
-
Woooooooaaaaa I feel like Rip Van Winkle here. Am I reading this correctly that as of some version of MC starting in the MC2023 family that "Avid MediaFiles/MXF/xxx" folders are no longer required to be at the root level of a drive? And that you can set where the drive will be in some menu? Michael Freedman says that this in Avid Ultimate
-
MC 2023.12.0 Intel iMac Big Sur I have been trying to use the File Insert Edit tool on a DNx HD HQX 29.97p file for a couple of days. I always get the following: "Insert edit export failed. File is not supported for insert edit." Out of frustration I uninstalled and installed 2023.3.1 and it works now. Seems like a bug to me. Jef
-
Single clip. I am getting the feeling this is somehow version related. I have worked around this and am moving on. Life is too short ...... Thanks, Jef
-
I was going to suggest that the OP take a screen grab of their settings and post. Could be a clue there. Jef
-
Making a file in Resolve that I will deliver to a client that will use it in Avid. I was QCing the file. Jef
-
Things to consider. 1. Are you dongle based or software based? If dongle and you want to stay that way (see current license issues some people are having) and are on a Mac (which it seems you are) you can not use a dongle beyond Big Sur. And 2023.12.0 ( the current version ) will work on that. I am using that version on Big Sur and it has been ok. 2
-
Just made a render in Resolve 18.6. DNx HD 220x 1080i 59.94 mxf Op1a. When linked into Avid 2023.12.0 it shows no TC at all. If I do the same render as mxf Op1 Atom, I get TC. Resolve sees TC in the file it created. Adobe Media Encoder sees TC in this file. Sigh ........ Jef
-
Converting Interlace to Progressive is difficult to do well, easy to do poorly. The fast, easy way is to repeat one of the fields. As you have seen, this reduces vertical resolution by half. I have not tired to transcode interlact to progressive in Avid but what you are seeing does not surprise me. I see two options for you. First is if you only have